*/Variable Listing for Project. For more information, refer to Table 1 in manuscript*/
*/emulatedv is the dichotomous emulation dependent variable. Does State A adopt community policing policy present in State B?*/
*/success is if State B experienced a decline in violent crime from prior year studied. It represents "Success" in the manuscipt*/
*/geoneighbor represents "Geographic neighbour"*/
*/samerepublican represents "Same unified Republican government"*/
*/samedemocrat represents "Same unified Democratic government"*/
*/ideolabsolute represents "Absolute difference in government ideology"*/
*/popratio represents "Population ratio"*/
*/absdiffrace represents "Absolute difference in minority population"*/
*/percapabsdiff represents "Absolute difference per capita income"*/
*/diffpolnum represents "Absolute differnce in community policing penetration"*/
*/revenue represents "Absolute difference in percent change in revenue"*/
*/diffspendpolice represents "Absolute difference in percent spent on policing"*/
*/naturallogpopulb represents "Log of Population"*/
*/percapitastateb represents "Per capita income"*/
*/commpoliceb represents "Community policing penetration"*/
*/prioremulate represents "Prior emulation"*/
*/year99 and year2000 are dummy variables for year of observation*/

*/Given that inserting two dummy variables representing each year of potential emulation when there are two years of potential emulation measured would present a major collinearity issue, only year dummies for the year 2000 emulation period are included in the final reported regression. Several other regressions were performed to see if there was a substantial change in results without the dummy indicators. There does not appear to be an issue. There is not a marked difference in either the sign or significance of any of the substantive variables examined. The command immediately below is the one reported in the journal. The "Absolute difference in percent change in revenue" coefficient reported in the journal table should read .0006 instead of .006 as it is in the printed article*/

logit emulatedv success  geoneighbor samerepublican samedemocrat ideolabsolute popratio absdiffrace percapabsdiff diffpolnum revenue diffspendpolice naturallogpopulb percapitastateb commpoliceb year2000  prioremulate, robust

*/Check to see if omitting time dummies and prior emulation indicator were to influence logit regression results*/

logit emulatedv success  geoneighbor samerepublican samedemocrat ideolabsolute popratio absdiffrace percapabsdiff diffpolnum revenue diffspendpolice naturallogpopulb percapitastateb commpoliceb year99  prioremulate, robust

logit emulatedv success  geoneighbor samerepublican samedemocrat ideolabsolute popratio absdiffrace percapabsdiff diffpolnum revenue diffspendpolice naturallogpopulb percapitastateb commpoliceb prioremulate, robust

logit emulatedv success  geoneighbor samerepublican samedemocrat ideolabsolute popratio absdiffrace percapabsdiff diffpolnum revenue diffspendpolice naturallogpopulb percapitastateb commpoliceb, robust

logit emulatedv success  geoneighbor samerepublican samedemocrat ideolabsolute popratio absdiffrace percapabsdiff diffpolnum revenue diffspendpolice naturallogpopulb percapitastateb commpoliceb  year2000  prioremulate, robust